The participation decision versus the level of participation in an environmental treaty: a spatial probit analysis
By James C. Murdoch, Todd Sandler, Wim P. M. Vijverberg. 2003
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bda9aae9ff59affce7fbb194c4ecd147106ae25a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Luc Anselin
- M. Moore
- Kurt J. Beron
- Wim P. M. Vijverberg
- James C. Murdoch
- Matthew J. Kotchen
- Chandra R. Bhat
- Roger S. Bivand
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Luc Anselin
- Kurt J. Beron
- Wim P. M. Vijverberg
- James C. Murdoch
- M. Moore
- Matthew J. Kotchen
- Matthew E. Kahn
- J. Bergh
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Why Cooperate? Public Goods, Economic Power, and the Montreal Protocol (2003, methodology): “Second, we provide a blueprint for estimating an interdependent probit model, which can be used to analyze other limited-dependent-variable problems that contain interdependent observations (for example, Murdoch, Sandler, and Vijverberg, 2003).”
- Thirty years of spatial econometrics (2010, methodology): “In addition, these models are increasingly used in empirical work, for example, Holloway et al. (2002); Murdoch et al. (2003); Chakir and Parent (2009); and Wang and Kockelman (2009).”
- Private Provision of Environmental Public Goods: Household Participation in Green-Electricity Programs (2007, background): “In a recent study, Murdoch et al. [ 23 ] consider a two-stage game in which agents first choose whether or not to participate, and then they choose their level of participation.”