Metal Oxide Nanostructures and Their Gas Sensing Properties: A Review

By Yufeng Sun, Shao-Bo Liu, Fanli Meng, Jinyun Liu, Zhen Jin, Lingtao Kong, Jinhuai Liu. Italian National Conference on Sensors, 2012

1,091 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Metal oxide gas sensors are predominant solid-state gas detecting devices for domestic, commercial and industrial applications, which have many advantages such as low cost, easy production, and compact size. However, the performance of such sensors is significantly influenced by the morphology and structure of sensing materials, resulting in a great obstacle for gas sensors based on bulk materials or dense films to achieve highly-sensitive properties. Lots of metal oxide nanostructures have been developed to improve the gas sensing properties such as sensitivity, selectivity, response speed, and so on. Here, we provide a brief overview of metal oxide nanostructures and their gas sensing properties from the aspects of particle size, morphology and doping. When the particle size of metal oxide is close to or less than double thickness of the space-charge layer, the sensitivity of the sensor will increase remarkably, which would be called “small size effect”, yet small size of metal oxide nanoparticles will be compactly sintered together during the film coating process which is disadvantage for gas diffusion in them. In view of those reasons, nanostructures with many kinds of shapes such as porous nanotubes, porous nanospheres and so on have been investigated, that not only possessed large surface area and relatively mass reactive sites, but also formed relatively loose film structures which is an advantage for gas diffusion. Besides, doping is also an effective method to decrease particle size and improve gas sensing properties. Therefore, the gas sensing properties of metal oxide nanostructures assembled by nanoparticles are reviewed in this article. The effect of doping is also summarized and finally the perspectives of metal oxide gas sensor are given.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd976adcaf1d40d70f3637a5896e361ff572687b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Maurizio Donarelli
  2. Yasuhiro Hayakawa
  3. S. Kawasaki
  4. R. Ganesh
  5. Mani Navaneethan
  6. C. Muthamizhchelvan
  7. S. Ponnusamy
  8. L. Kou

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Yasuhiro Hayakawa
  2. S. Kawasaki
  3. R. Ganesh
  4. Mani Navaneethan
  5. C. Muthamizhchelvan
  6. S. Ponnusamy
  7. Maurizio Donarelli
  8. Sundaram Swaminathan

In Polymers and Plastics

  1. Sundaram Swaminathan
  2. K. Singh
  3. Giovanni Neri
  4. S. H. Varghese
  5. V. Mittal
  6. Maurizio Donarelli
  7. Luca Ottaviano
  8. S. Varghese

Citations in the corpus