Land-use scene classification using multi-scale completed local binary patterns
By Chen Chen, Baochang Zhang, Hongjun Su, Wei Li, Lu Wang. 2015
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art (2017, methodology): “This dataset has also been widely adopted to evaluate various different scene classification methods [9, 16, 18, 33, 37, 83-87, 97].”
- Fusion of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Land Cover Classification of High-Resolution Imagery (2017, methodology): “Chen et al. [20] achieved a 93.4% accuracy using their local binary patterns and extreme learning machine technique, while Sheng et al. [21] obtained 94.6% average classification accuracy.”
- Hierarchical Coding Vectors for Scene Level Land-Use Classification (2016, methodology): “…[35] 82.7 ˘ 1.2 Concentric circle-structured BOVW [2] 86.6 ˘ 0.8 Multifeature concatenation [36] 89.5 ˘ 0.8 Pyramid-of-spatial-relations [3] 89.1 CLBP [27] 85.5 ˘ 1.9 MS-CLBP [27] 90.6 ˘ 1.4 HCV 90.5 ˘ 1.1 Our method 91.8 ˘ 1.3 The comparison results for RSSCN7 database are listed in Table 4.”
- Rotation-Insensitive and Context-Augmented Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images (2018, background): “…low-level features such as scale invariant feature transform [33], histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) [34], and local binary patterns [35], [36], and there are also some frameworks that try to improve image resolution or combine/fuse several features to improve image representation…”