Economic benefits of climate-smart agricultural practices to smallholder farmers in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India
By A. Khatri-Chhetri, J. Aryal, T. Sapkota, R. Khurana. 2016
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd8e3ca0af2e5b755c1acf682cf03280149501b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Gangetic plains of Bihar, India (2018, background): “Recent studies showed that most of the CSAPs have clear economic (Aryal et al., 2015; Erenstein et al., 2008; Khatri-Chhetri et al., 2016; Sapkota et al., 2015) and climate change adaptation benefits (Aryal et al., 2016; Sapkota et al., 2015).”
- Impact of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Practices on Cotton Production and Livelihood of Farmers in Punjab, Pakistan (2018, background): “These results are in line with previous studies [15,24,32].”
- Farmers' prioritization of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) technologies (2017, background): “Similarly, several farm level studies also suggest that adoption of CSA technologies can improve crop yields, increase input use efficiency, increase net income and reduce GHG emissions (Khatri-Chhetri et al., 2016; Sapkota et al., 2014; Gathala et al., 2011).”
- Rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia: issues, options and opportunities (2019, unknown): “4), reduces land-preparation costs (Table 6; Erenstein and Laxmi 2008; Sapkota et al. 2015; Khatri-Chhetri et al. 2016; Shahzad et al. 2017), and improves soil biological activities, soil fertility and soil structure (Mohanty et al.”