Random measurement error and regression dilution bias

By J. Hutcheon, A. Chiolero, James A. Hanley. British medical journal, 2010

709 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd857a02f9bf497ef820c32e8ef31d2ff2c6fde9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

1. George Davey Smith
2. J. Bowden

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Maurício Rodrigues Lopes
2. J. Rey-López
3. George Davey Smith
4. J. Bowden
5. O. Luiz
6. V. Matsudo
7. L. D. de Rezende

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies (2018, background): “Egger analyses are more susceptible to regression dilution bias (57,60).”
• Geophysics From Terrestrial Time‐Variable Gravity Measurements (2017, background): “This is known as attenuation or regressions dilution bias (Hutcheon et al., 2010).”
• Sedentary Behavior and Health Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2014, methodology): “[55] Further information regarding methods of measurement in epidemiological studies of sedentary behavior have been described in detail elsewhere.”