VIABLE BUT NON-CULTURABLE FORMS OF FOOD AND WATERBORNE BACTERIA: QUO VADIS?

By N. Rowan. 2004

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biotechnology, Endocrinology, Food Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd7ee963c8fdc635099d37f56a330ec39bd5d1e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biotechnology

1. J. Oliver

In Endocrinology

1. J. Oliver

In Food Science

1. J. Oliver

Citations in the corpus

• The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens (2014, background): “For instance, Rowan (2004) has focused on foodborne and waterborne bacteria, Oliver (2010) has focused on bacteria that are pathogenic to plants, animals or humans and Pinto et al. (2013) have discussed both pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria.”
• Recent findings on the viable but nonculturable state in pathogenic bacteria. (2010, background): “Several reviews on the VBNC state have also appeared in recent years, mostly in its support (McDougald et al., 1998; Colwell & Grimes, 2000; Edwards, 2000; Yamamoto, 2000; Rowan, 2004; Oliver, 2005a, b, 2006; Sardessai, 2005; Barcina & Arana, 2009) but a few opposed (Nyström, 2005; Sinton, 2006).”