European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry

By D. Demailly, Philippe Quirion. 2008

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd55b6f3c3193f48efd0cd899223dac52d7fe2f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU emissions trading scheme (2014, background): “…2.1 above.15 Ex ante evaluations have suggested that the EU ETS adversely impacts on production in most regulated industries while rising electricity prices lower the profitability of highly exposed industries such as primary aluminum production (e.g. Demailly and Quirion, 2008; Reinaud, 2005).”
A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS (2012, background): “Demailly and Quirion [55] h20/t (mean) 57% free allocation 75% in EU EBITDA constant”
Would Border Carbon Adjustments Prevent Carbon Leakage and Heavy Industry Competitiveness Losses? Insights From a Meta-Analysis of Recent Economic Studies (2014, neutral): “For example Abatement is set at 20% for 61% of the cases and varies within two studies only (Böhringer et al., 2012a; Demailly and Quirion, 2008).”
An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect (2010, background): “Similarly, Demailly and Quirion [49] introduced a partial equilibrium model to quantify the impact of the EU ETS on enterprise competitiveness (including production and profitability) for the iron and steel industry in the EU, concluding that overall competitiveness losses were quite small; specific”
Firm Competitiveness and the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (2013, neutral): “Table 7: Results on Employment for Cement (1) (2) (3) (4) Phase 1 Participation 0.”