TOWARD A GLOBAL EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF PROTOPLANETARY DISKS

By Xue-Ning Bai. 2016

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A global picture of the evolution of protoplanetary disks (PPDs) is key to understanding almost every aspect of planet formation, where standard α-disk models have been continually employed for their simplicity. In the meantime, disk mass loss has been conventionally attributed to photoevaporation, which controls disk dispersal. However, a paradigm shift toward accretion driven by magnetized disk winds has taken place in recent years, thanks to studies of non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic effects in PPDs. I present a framework of global PPD evolution aiming to incorporate these advances, highlighting the role of wind-driven accretion and wind mass loss. Disk evolution is found to be largely dominated by wind-driven processes, and viscous spreading is suppressed. The timescale of disk evolution is controlled primarily by the amount of external magnetic flux threading the disks, and how rapidly the disk loses the flux. Rapid disk dispersal can be achieved if the disk is able to hold most of its magnetic flux during the evolution. In addition, because wind launching requires a sufficient level of ionization at the disk surface (mainly via external far-UV (FUV) radiation), wind kinematics is also affected by the FUV penetration depth and disk geometry. For a typical disk lifetime of a few million years, the disk loses approximately the same amount of mass through the wind as through accretion onto the protostar, and most of the wind mass loss proceeds from the outer disk via a slow wind. Fractional wind mass loss increases with increasing disk lifetime. Significant wind mass loss likely substantially enhances the dust-to-gas mass ratio and promotes planet formation.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd39c449bc65bffd1a61df57b8957db34dbb763b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. E. Lopez
  2. Jon Fortney
  3. C. Mordasini
  4. Y. Alibert
  5. J. Dra̧żkowska
  6. R. Murray-Clay
  7. D. Thorngren
  8. Xue-Ning Bai

In Spectroscopy

  1. Y. Alibert
  2. J. Dra̧żkowska
  3. R. Murray-Clay
  4. Xue-Ning Bai
  5. Jon Fortney
  6. C. Alexander

Citations in the corpus