PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature

By Zhiyong Lu. Database J. Biol. Databases Curation, 2011

576 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The past decade has witnessed the modern advances of high-throughput technology and rapid growth of research capacity in producing large-scale biological data, both of which were concomitant with an exponential growth of biomedical literature. This wealth of scholarly knowledge is of significant importance for researchers in making scientific discoveries and healthcare professionals in managing health-related matters. However, the acquisition of such information is becoming increasingly difficult due to its large volume and rapid growth. In response, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) is continuously making changes to its PubMed Web service for improvement. Meanwhile, different entities have devoted themselves to developing Web tools for helping users quickly and efficiently search and retrieve relevant publications. These practices, together with maturity in the field of text mining, have led to an increase in the number and quality of various Web tools that provide comparable literature search service to PubMed. In this study, we review 28 such tools, highlight their respective innovations, compare them to the PubMed system and one another, and discuss directions for future development. Furthermore, we have built a website dedicated to tracking existing systems and future advances in the field of biomedical literature search. Taken together, our work serves information seekers in choosing tools for their needs and service providers and developers in keeping current in the field. Database URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Lu/search

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd2062eb413816144bcfc1c8511f73712c67ac74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Zhiyong Lu
  2. Philip S. Yu
  3. Erik Cambria
  4. Robert Leaman
  5. Rezarta Islamaj Dogan
  6. Lichao Sun
  7. Shervin Minaee
  8. Jiao Li

In Genetics

  1. Robert Leaman
  2. Rezarta Islamaj Dogan
  3. Zhiyong Lu
  4. Philip S. Yu
  5. Jianxin Li
  6. Congyin Xia
  7. Renyu Yang
  8. Qian Li

In Molecular Biology

  1. Zhiyong Lu
  2. Robert Leaman
  3. Rezarta Islamaj Dogan
  4. Jiao Li
  5. Philip S. Yu
  6. Lichao Sun
  7. Qian Li
  8. Congyin Xia

Citations in the corpus