Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in Optimality Theory

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gaps in factorial typology: The case of voicing in consonant clusters (2002, methodology): “Lombardi (1999: 272) examined these cases, and posited the following markedness constraint to express the avoided configuration: (8) AGREE: Obstruent clusters should agree in voicing.”
Final devoicing and voicing assimilation in Dutch derivation and cliticization (2000, methodology): “‘advisable’ according to Lombardi (1996, 1999) Input: /ra:d/ + /za:m/ FRICVOICE AGREE IDONSLAR *LAR IDENTLAR a. [ra:d.za:m] *! ** b. [ra:t.za:m] *! * * * c. [ra:d.sa:m] *! * * * d. " [ra:t.sa:m] * ** Lombardi (1996, 1999) is not concerned with inflection and clitics and her proposal does not…”
Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics (2009, background): “See Lombardi (1999) for an analysis in terms of constraint interaction.”
Consonant cluster neutralisation and targeted constraints (2001, background): “…of voiced obstruents relative to voiceless obstruents) is comparable in scope to the evidence for the place-markedness subhierarchy (Keating 1984, Lombardi 1997, 1999).5 Before turning to my solution, I note an additional type of data that will be relevant for the discussion of possible…”