OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (Second Edition)
By Pascal Hitzler, Markus Krötzsch, Bijan Parsia, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, S. Rudolph. 2012
1,081 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bce0b752e7f5288d8032ca971f72a3c58e810a7c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Pieter-Jan Pauwels
- Yong-Cheol Lee
- Sijie Zhang
- Md Kamruzzaman Sarker
- Ning Xie
- Derek Doran
- Michael L. Raymer
- Riccardo Petrolo
Citations in the corpus
- Explainable AI (XAI): Core Ideas, Techniques, and Solutions (2022, unknown): “Knowledge graphs represent facts, usually in the W3C standard, Resource Description Framework [5] or using graph databases and can be linked to ontologies that represent background or contextual knowledge commonly in the Web Ontology Language [29].”
- Towards a smart city based on cloud of things, a survey on the smart city vision and paradigms (2014, background): “However, these standards do not provide facilities for abstraction, categorisation and reasoning rather offered by [22], within the World Wide Web Consortium Semantic Sensor Network Incubator group defined a Web Ontology Language2 [23], answering the need for a domain-independent and end-to-end mode”
- Semantic web technologies in AEC industry: A literature overview (2017, methodology): “The semantic web namely relies on OWL for the representation of the semantic meaning of concepts [24] , which is grounded in Description Logic (DL — [25] ).”
- Explaining Trained Neural Networks with Semantic Web Technologies: First Steps (2017, methodology): “At the same time, they play a very prominent role in the Semantic Web field since they are the foundation for one of the central Semantic Web standards, namely the W3C Web Ontology Language OWL [11,12].”
- Knowledge Graphs (2020, unknown): “For details of concrete syntaxes, we rather refer to the OWL and OBOF standards [239, 365].”