Evaluating Topic Coherence Using Distributional Semantics
By Nikolaos Aletras, Mark Stevenson. International Conference on Computational Semantics, 2013
355 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcd1c98f58aa580a628cf4c690efca947f89dbae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Shaheen Syed
- Jey Han Lau
- Derek O'Callaghan
- Michael Röder
- Timothy Baldwin
- Uttam Chauhan
- Trevor Cohn
- Marco René Spruit
Citations in the corpus
- An analysis of the coherence of descriptors in topic modeling (2015, methodology): “TC-W2V – as an analog to the DS measures of Aletras and Stevenson (2013), we propose the creation of term vectors w v using a word2vec model (Mikolov et al., 2013).”
- Topic Modeling Using Latent Dirichlet allocation (2021, background): “The aforementioned research effort advocates that the quality of a topic is often determined by the coherence [1, 101, 145] of its constituent words and its relative importance [1, 69] to the analysis task in comparison to other topics [70].”
- Topically Driven Neural Language Model (2017, background): “Newman et al. (2010b); Mimno et al. (2011); Aletras and Stevenson (2013) propose automatic approaches to computing topic coherence, and Lau et al. (2014) summarises these methods to understand their differences.”
- Measuring Model Biases in the Absence of Ground Truth (2021, methodology): “This information theoretic approach to uncovering word associations became a prominent method in the field of Natural Language Processing, with applications ranging from measuring topic coherence [1] to collocation extraction [4] to great effect, although often requiring a good deal of preprocessing”
- Full-Text or Abstract? Examining Topic Coherence Scores Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (2017, background): “The differences between topics are calculated with a topic coherence measure [18]–[21] that shows, in contrast to the likelihood of heldout data, a higher correlation with human topic ranking data, the gold standard for topic interpretability.”
- Machine Reading Tea Leaves: Automatically Evaluating Topic Coherence and Topic Model Quality (2014, methodology): “Aletras and Stevenson (2013a) introduced distributional semantic similarity methods for computing coherence, calculating the distributional similarity between semantic vectors for the top-N topic words using a range of distributional similarity measures such as cosine similarity and the Dice…”
- Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures (2015, methodology): “In case W ′ and W ∗ consist of single words, the vector elements are just the direct confirmations as suggested in [1].”