Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian learning
By F. Dan Foresee, Martin T. Hagan. 1997
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. V. Lint
- Serge P. Hoogendoorn
- Henk J. van Zuylen
- M. Afyuni
- B. Mathur
- Julian Morris
- Tao Chen
- Hossein Khademi
Citations in the corpus
- A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities (2018, background): “However, there are many ways to avoid overfitting, such as regularization [28], data augmentation [22], dropout [29], dropconnect [30], or early stopping [31].”
- Neural network models to predict cation exchange capacity in arid regions of Iran (2005, methodology): “…MSEReg, in which the sum of network weights is added to the MSE: MSEReg ¼ MSEþ ð1 ÞMSW; ð5Þ where is a performance ratio calculated by means of the Bayesian regularization in combination with the Levenberg– Marquardt algorithm (Foresee & Hagan, 1997), and MSW is the mean of the squared weights.”
- Freeway Travel Time Prediction with State-Space Neural Networks: Modeling State-Space Dynamics with Recurrent Neural Networks (2002, background): “For a comprehensive treatment of these techniques, see elsewhere ( 23, 24 ).”
- Accurate freeway travel time prediction with state-space neural networks under missing data (2005, methodology): “Details on the algorithms used (Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian Regularization LM–BR) can be found in Hagan and Menhaj (1994) and Foresee and Hagan (1997) respectively.”