DIFFERENCES BETWEEN POPULATIONS OF REED WARBLERS IN DEFENCES AGAINST BROOD PARASITISM

By A. Lindholm, R. Thomas. 2000

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcbca4328d0a1bf002e53ef730b6f4678d14e41e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Nicholas B. Davies
2. E. Røskaft
3. A. Moksnes
4. B. Stokke
5. C. Moskát
6. M. Honza
7. P. Procházka
8. S. Gill

Citations in the corpus

• How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds (2002, background): “…can function as a defence against brood parasitism is provided by studies that found egg rejection rates to correlate with the likelihood of cuckoo parasitism spatially (Davies & Brooke 1989; Soler et al. 1999; Lindholm & Thomas 2000), or temporally (Brooke et al. 1998; Nakamura et al. 1998).”
• Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? (2004, background): “As stated previously, rejection behaviour may vary between different populations of the same species (e.g., Davies and Brooke 1989; Briskie et al. 1992; Soler et al. 1998, 1999; Lindholm and Thomas 2000; Moskát et al. 2002).”
• Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts (2002, background): “(1998, 1999a), Lindholm (1999) and Lindholm & Thomas (2000) and the approach was further developed by R0skaft et al.”
• Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning (2011, background): “…of parasitism, increasing nest defence, egg rejection and chick rejection in places and at times when parasitism is more likely (e.g. nest defence: Lindholm & Thomas, 2000; Røskaft et al., 2002; Welbergen & Davies, 2009; egg rejection: Brooke, Davies & Noble, 1998; Stokke et al., 2008; chick…”
• Functional reference in an alarm signal given during nest defence: seet calls of yellow warblers denote brood-parasitic brown-headed cowbirds (2004, background): “…1991; Neudorf and Sealy 1992; Hobson and Villard 1998; Prather et al. 1999), and that defensive responses are less developed or absent in populations allopatric or recently sympatric with brood parasites (e.g. Lindholm and Thomas 2000; Røskaft et al. 2002; but see, e.g., Prather et al. 1999).”
• The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos (2002, background): “Because the parasitism pressure of brood parasites may vary spatially as well as temporarily, it has recently been stressed that host responses toward cuckoo parasitism have to be regarded in a metapopulation perspective (Lindholm, 1999; Lindholm and Thomas, 2000).”