Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness

By R. Peterson. 2005

546 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb9698b17f015ad936f62cf2d089343db96d979

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Ken Green
2. Sharon Wheeler
3. T. Chan
4. J. Goldthorpe

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ken Green
2. Sharon Wheeler
3. T. Chan
4. J. Goldthorpe
5. G. Dragolov
6. J. Delhey
7. K. Rowlingson

In Urban Studies

1. Ken Green
2. Sharon Wheeler
3. T. Chan
4. J. Goldthorpe

Citations in the corpus

• Social stratification and cultural consumption: The visual arts in England (2007, background): “Furthermore, Peterson (2005) himself has been led to suggest a distinction between ‘highbrow’ and ‘lowbrow’ omnivores which—to us at least—would seem to compromise his initial insight.”
• Parenting in relation to children’s sports participation: generational changes and potential implications (2014, background): “The first is that parents increasingly subscribe to the ‘omnivore thesis’ – that ‘good’ taste is participation in and/or appreciation of a breadth of cultural activities across high-, middle- and low-brow genres (Peterson, 2005) – and this has come to be reflected in their parenting.”