Social functions of allogrooming in cooperatively breeding meerkats

By Nobuyuki Kutsukake, T. H. Clutton-Brock. 2006

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb46905fc771cbdc52ccc825af9ed6d4204ce98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Elise Huchard
2. T. H. Clutton-Brock
3. Julian A. Drewe
4. G. Pearce
5. J. Madden

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Elise Huchard
2. T. H. Clutton-Brock
3. J. Madden
4. Damien Farine
5. Andrew F. Russell
6. Joan B. Silk
7. K. Kramer

In Social Psychology

1. T. H. Clutton-Brock
2. Elise Huchard

Citations in the corpus

• Social competition and its consequences in female mammals (2013, background): “Similarly, in Kalahari meerkats, foraging females usually respect 493 each other’s access to feeding sites and seldom contest access to feeding sites, 494 though the most dominant female in each group occasionally displaces 495 subordinates (Kutsukake & Clutton-Brock 2006a).”
• The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 1. Inter-group interactions (2009, background): “It is likely that these active groomers may be subordinate females, grooming to placate a new dominant female (Kutsukake and Clutton-Brock 2006).”