THE EFFECTS OF PRODUCTIVITY, HERBIVORY, AND PLANT SPECIES TURNOVER IN GRASSLAND FOOD WEBS
By Jonathan M. Chase, M. Leibold, A. Downing, Jonathan B. Shurin. 2000
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb0255caced0e66d488eae243c8f8229aac3046
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jonathan M. Chase
- James C. Stegen
- K. Davies
- T. O. Crist
- Nathan J B Kraft
- S. Harrison
- M. Vellend
- J. Myers
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Jonathan M. Chase
- James C. Stegen
- M. Vellend
- J. Myers
- S. Harrison
- Jonathan B. Shurin
- K. Davies
- Nathan J B Kraft
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Jonathan M. Chase
- James C. Stegen
- M. Vellend
- S. Harrison
- K. Davies
- Nathan J B Kraft
- B. Inouye
- N. Swenson
Citations in the corpus
- Stochastic and deterministic drivers of spatial and temporal turnover in breeding bird communities (2012, background): “For example, spatial turnover often increases with primary production (e.g. Chase et al., 2000; Chase & Leibold, 2002; but see Bonn et al., 2004; Gaston et al., 2007), perhaps because of increased stochasticity in more productive habitats (Chase, 2010).”
- INDUCIBLE DEFENSES AND TROPHIC STRUCTURE (2004, background): “Plant biomass has been shown to increase with productivity, irrespective of the number of trophic levels (Hansson 1992, Brett and Goldman 1997, Chase et al. 2000, Oksanen and Oksanen 2000: Fig.”
- Scale dependence in the species-richness-productivity relationship: The role of species turnover (2004, background): “In contrast to previous studies showing species turnover increasing with productivity (Leibold 1999, Chase et al. 2000, Chase and Leibold 2002), spatial turnover at Jornada and Konza peaked at intermediate values of productivity and temporal turnover did not vary with productivity.”
- The strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems: predictions from allometry and energetics (2005, background): “Finally, productivity may play a role in determining the number of trophic levels and the strength of top-down control (Oksanen et al . 1981; McQueen et al . 1986; Power 1992; Sarnelle 1992; Wootton & Power 1993; Chase et al . 2000 ).”
- Relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces in terrestrial tritrophic plant-insect herbivore-natural enemy systems (2001, background): “Empirical tests of the strengths of top-down and bottom-up forces in terrestrial systems remain rare (Strong 1992; but see Spiller and Schoener 1990, 1994, Chase et al. 2000).”
- INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF PREDATION AND DISPERSAL ON ZOOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES (2001, background): “One potential explanation for this variability is that the effects of predators depend on colonization by new species from the surrounding region (Leibold et al. 1997, Chase et al. 2000).”
- Defoliation and patchy nutrient return drive grazing effects on plant and soil properties in a dairy cow pasture (2009, background): “…ecosystems, large mammalian herbivores are known to influence plant community structure (Coppock et al. 1983, Cid et al. 1991, Collins et al. 1998, Chase et al. 2000, Hellström et al. 2003), primary production (McNaughton 1976, Frank and McNaughton 1993), and growth and turnover of plant roots…”