Otolith science entering the 21st century
By S. Campana. 2005
316 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bca7f3e5976ffe0353d6cfadc687a1c39cdde35e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Discriminant function analysis in marine ecology: some oversights and their solutions (2007, unknown): “The continued interest among biologists in describ ing differences in fishery stocks and connectivity among fish populations and the availability of power ful statistical software is increasing the popularity of both otolith chemistry (Campana 2005) and DFA.”
- Otolith research and application: current directions in innovation and implementation (2005, background): “Scientific papers relating to otolith research are now being published at five times the rate that they were in the 1970s, with the annual rate approaching 200 papers per year (Campana 2005).”
- Chemical archives in fishes beyond otoliths: A review on the use of other body parts as chronological recorders of microchemical constituents for expanding interpretations of environmental, ecological, and life‐history changes (2017, background): “Specifically, aging studies on calcified structures have become the accepted norm for stock assessments and continue to lead the way in developing an understanding of population age structures (Francis and Campana 2004; Campana 2005; Kerr and Campana 2014).”
- A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris (2010, background): “Otoliths are now proving to serve as an invaluable resource for fisheries science, which extends well beyond mere age estimation (Campana 2005).”