A simple single camera 3C3D velocity measurement technique without errors due to depth of correlation and spatial averaging for microfluidics

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the resolution limit of digital particle image velocimetry (2012, methodology): “For the investigation here, a wavelet-based algorithm was used (Cierpka et al. 2010), since this algorithm works much faster than a Gaussian fit and gives reliable results in a wide range of particle image sizes.”
Higher order multi-frame particle tracking velocimetry (2013, background): “In general, such predictors can be based on theoretically known velocity distributions or experimentally obtained PIV evaluations (Cardwell et al. 2011; Cowen and Monismith 1997; Keane et al. 1995; Takehara et al. 2000).”
On the uncertainty of digital PIV and PTV near walls (2012, background): “A Mexican hat function performed particularly well for microfluidic investigations (Cierpka et al. 2010).”
Particle imaging techniques for volumetric three-component (3D3C) velocity measurements in microfluidics (2011, background): “Cierpka et al (2010) investigated the laminar flow in a channel with a square cross section of 500 9 500 lm2 at Re = 23.”