Forests in the Economy of the Rural Poor: An Estimation of the Dependency Level

By V. Bahuguna. 2000

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc9e0b9bbb8174fefeb6b7c7697fb051c86b1299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Shreekant Gupta
2. D. Pearce
3. Urvashi Narain
4. K. Veld
5. Richard S. J. Tol
6. Edward B. Barbier
7. Cameron Hepburn
8. A. Owen

Citations in the corpus

• The Economic Value of Forest Ecosystems (2001, background): “…and timber can yield as much net revenue as agriculture Kramer et al. 1995 Mantandia, Madagascar 47 (lost forest products as % of household output) Bahuguna 2000 Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Gujarat, India 49 (fuelwood and fodder 31%, 10% employment, 6% other NTFPs, 2% timber and bamboo)…”
• Poverty and resource dependence in rural India (2008, background): “Please cite this article as: Narain, U. et al., Poverty and resource dependence in rural India, Ecological Economics (2007), doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.021 Senaratne Abeygunawardena, 1993; Hegde et al., 1996; Singh et al., 1996; Bahuguna, 2000; Beck and Ghosh, 2000; Cavendish, 2000; Fisher, 20”