Textile-reinforced mortar versus FRP jacketing in seismic retrofitting of RC columns with continuous or lap-spliced deformed bars
By D. Bournas, T. Triantafillou, K. Zygouris, F. Stavropoulos. 2009
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc6d2aa103ee9da1c95b50ff0ef57bce81379df7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Civil and Structural Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- TRM versus FRP in flexural strengthening of RC beams: Behaviour at high temperatures (2017, unknown): “16–20]; the seismic retrofitting of RC columns [21-26]; and the seismic reinforcing of infilled RC frames [27].”
- Matrix–fiber bond behavior in PBO FRCM composites: A fracture mechanics approach (2014, background): “The limited available literature [1–23] reports that FRCM composites can be used effectively for strengthening and rehabilitation of RC structures.”
- Experimental analysis on bond between PBO-FRCM strengthening materials and concrete (2013, background): “Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) materials are usually identified in the technical literature with the acronyms TRM (textile reinforced mortar) [1,2], TRC (textile reinforced concrete) [3–8], MBC (mineral based composites) [9] or FRC (fiber reinforced cement) [10].”