Otolith size trends in marine fish communities from different depth strata

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic (2008, background): “); ecomorphology and functional hearing in fishes (e.g. Gauldie, 1988; Lombarte, 1992; Popper and Platt, 1993; Aguirre and Lombarte, 1999; Lychakov and Rebane, 2000; Ramcharitar et al., 2001, 2004; Aguirre, 2003; Tuset et al., 2003b; Volpedo and Echevarria 2003; Cruz and Lombarte, 2004; Lychakov et ”
Ecomorphological trends and phylogenetic inertia of otolith sagittae in Nototheniidae (2010, methodology): “For each species the measurements were standardized by removing allometry (Lleonart et al. 2000) and calculating a relative size index (OR) for each otolith according to OR=10,000OALT −2 (Lombarte and Cruz 2007), where LT=fish total length (mm).”
A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris (2010, background): “Many factors are thought to control otolith shape including temperature, depth and feeding history (Wilson 1985; Lombarte and Lleonart 1993; Gauldie and Crampton 2002; Gagliano and McCormick 2004; Lombarte and Cruz 2007).”
Fantastically plastic: fish larvae equipped for a new world (2013, background): “Otolith shape changes gradually throughout ontogeny, from the nearly spherical form common in most larvae to highly specialized shapes that are unique to species and often with variations within species (Torres et al. 2000; Lombarte & Cruz 2007).”