Beyond ad hocery: Defining Creative Industries
By Terry Flew. 2002
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc46c889e25ce3b1e2addf237818b5d9eb872b1a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Creative Industries after the First Decade of Debate (2010, background): “The early list-based approach to creative industries developed in the UK context by DCMS was open to the charge of ad hocery, as it was not clear what were the underlying threads linking this seemingly heterogeneous set of industry subsectors (Flew 2002).”
- The cultural and creative industries: a review of the literature (2007, background): “These reservations about ‘the arts’ are extended to cultural policy as a whole by those writers at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) who have done as much as anyone to give ‘creative industries’ a theoretical legitimacy (Cunningham, 2002; 2004; Flew, 2002; Hartley, 2005).”