From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK

By F. Kern, Adrian Smith, Christopher L. Shaw, Rob P. J. M. Raven, B. Verhees. 2014

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc4581ad71e39eb2293aed12b4c16a558530b34f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. A. Buzogány
2. C. Mitchell
3. Kristin Reichardt
4. Stefan Ćetković
5. Karoline S. Rogge

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. Marko P. Hekkert
3. Simona Negro
4. Gard Hopsdal Hansen
5. Kristin Reichardt
6. C. Kuzemko
7. A. Buzogány
8. M. Lockwood

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. Kristin Reichardt
3. Gard Hopsdal Hansen
4. C. Kuzemko
5. A. Buzogány
6. M. Lockwood
7. C. Mitchell
8. Marko P. Hekkert

Citations in the corpus

• Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany (2016, background): “Yet local content requests, as can be increasingly observed in the UK (Kern et al., 2014), for instance, may hamper such a Europeanization of the TIS, which may become a future concern of policy makers.”
• Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda (2017, background): “This concept has been taken up within the energy sphere, especially in relation to the UK (e.g. Helm 2005, Kern et al 2014), which is perhaps not surprising given the strength of ideas about the efficacy of market mechanisms there, including in areas such as renewable support mechanisms (Mitchell…”
• Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition (2016, unknown): “This protection may arise from deliberate government policy or be an accident of institutional structure [24].”
• Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway (2018, result): “In the absence of a technology-specific support scheme similar to those found in countries with a strong domestic OWP market formation (Kern et al. 2014), the anticipated OWP market failed to materialize in Norway.”
• Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics (2016, background): “A range of new institutional bodies and government-funded initiatives have been launched to ensure the realization of the offshore wind development strategy, including education programmes, investment grants and R&D projects (Kern et al., 2014, 21).”