Power analysis based on spatial effects mixed models: A tool for comparing design and analysis strategies in the presence of spatial variability
By Walter W. Stroup. 2002
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc44377b5296b174834d10e7b6d52cdb10701f86
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees (2005, methodology): “For pooled, experiment-wide analyses (experiments 1, 2 and 4), we performed nested ANOVAs with trial analysed as a random effect using PROC MIXED, and with bee nested within trial.”
- Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk (2004, methodology): “We calculated the noncentrality parameter for each effect by using themethod and formulae of Stroup (2002), and we used the observed variance from our mixed-model analysis (Thomas, 1997).”
- Seed predation, not seed dispersal, explains the landscape‐level abundance of an early‐successional plant (2006, methodology): “We used the method and formulae of Stroup (2002), the observed variance from our mixed-model analysis (Thomas 1997), and a two-tailed type I error rate (alpha) of 0.05 for calculating power.”