Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Bond Strength Between Concrete Substrate and Repair Materials

By A. Momayez, M. Ehsani, Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour, H. Rajaie. 2005

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc3f173095646f43bfbee0e70daec72d1a81e454

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. F. Pacheco-Torgal
2. João Castro-Gomes
3. Said Jalali

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. F. Pacheco-Torgal
2. João Castro-Gomes
3. Said Jalali
4. A. Rashad
5. N. Neithalath
6. Yining Ding
7. Sundararaman Chithiraputhiran
8. Z. Abdollahnejad

Citations in the corpus

• Adhesion characterization of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Influence of OPC concrete substrate surface treatment (2008, background): “Several test methods such as pull-off, splitting, flexural, and slant shear, have been proposed to evaluate the bond properties of repair materials, although they depend on the repair material and on the state of stress of the interface [8,9].”
• Accelerated ageing behaviour of the adhesive bond between concrete specimens and CFRP overlays (2011, methodology): “[24] and Aiello and Leone [25], that the measured bond strength between the concrete substrate and repair materials is highly dependent on the test method, due to large variations in the stress field at the bonded interface; measured values were found to be up to 8 times larger from one method to th”