Monetianthus mirus gen. et sp. nov., a Nymphaealean Flower from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal

By E. M. Friis, Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen, M. von Balthazar, G. Grimm, P. Crane. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PLANT SCIENCES, 2009

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc1f038ae8c92e50a703d19b0959cfbda35747e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Doyle
2. P. K. Endress
3. Mark W. Chase
4. M. Gandolfo
5. D. Soltis
6. Pamela S. Soltis
7. Thomas Borsch
8. Chelsea D. Specht

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Doyle
2. P. K. Endress
3. S. Mathews
4. Mark W. Chase
5. J. Pires
6. O. Maurin
7. D. Soltis
8. Pamela S. Soltis

In Plant Science

1. P. K. Endress
2. J. Doyle
3. J. Pires

Citations in the corpus

• Phylogenetics, divergence times and diversification from three genomic partitions in monocots (2015, background): “Later coding of characters of this fossil for phylogenetic analysis confirmed this placement (Friis et al., 2009).”
• Integrating Early Cretaceous Fossils into the Phylogeny of Living Angiosperms: ANITA Lines and Relatives of Chloranthaceae (2014, methodology): “Friis et al. (2009) scored septal nectaries (111) as absent, but because of the possibility that the septal slits between the carpels were nectaries, we score this character as unknown.”