Conservation of Wildlife Populations: Demography, Genetics, and Management
By L. S. Mills. 2006
329 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbe5399f5b7e562f6bf138e5e84a6c20e40e0247
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Hervieux
- Mark Hebblewhite
- Bruce C. Robertson
- HervieuxD.
- D. Stepnisky
- W. Lowe
- S. Boutin
- Michelle M. Bacon
Citations in the corpus
- Managing wolves (Canis lupus) to recover threatened woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Alberta (2014, background): “This small size increase the chances of demographic stochasticity (Mills 2007) manifested through mortality events greatly reducing the potential population benefits of wolf removal.”
- What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? (2010, background): “Demographically connected populations are those in which population growth rates (k, r) or specific vital rates (survival and birth rates) are affected by immigration or emigration (Hanski & Gilpin 1997; Runge et al. 2006; Mills 2007).”
- Widespread declines in woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) continue in Alberta (2013, methodology): “The population trend, or growth rate ( ), is then estimated from Nt+1 / Nt (Mills 2007).”
- The population decline of the New Zealand sea lion Phocarctos hookeri: a review of possible causes (2011, background): “Importantly, small changes in adult female survival probability, as seen in the Auckland Island NZ sea lion population (Chilvers & Mackenzie 2010), significantly affect population stability and population trend in large, long-lived mammals (Caughley 1966, Mills 2006, Pendleton et al. 2006).”