NBDT: Neural-Backed Decision Trees

By Alvin Wan, Lisa Dunlap, Daniel Ho, Jihan Yin, Scott Lee, Henry Jin, Suzanne Petryk, Sarah Adel Bargal, Joseph E. Gonzalez. 2020

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Machine learning applications such as finance and medicine demand accurate and justifiable predictions, barring most deep learning methods from use. In response, previous work combines decision trees with deep learning, yielding models that (1) sacrifice interpretability to maintain accuracy or (2) underperform modern neural networks to maintain interpretability. We forgo this dilemma by proposing Neural-Backed Decision Trees (NBDTs), modified hierarchical classifiers that use trees constructed in weight-space. Our NBDTs achieve (1) interpretability and (2) neural network accuracy: We preserve interpretable properties -- e.g., leaf purity and a non-ensembled model -- and demonstrate interpretability of model predictions both qualitatively and quantitatively. Furthermore, NBDTs match state-of-the-art neural networks on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, TinyImageNet, and ImageNet to within 1-2%. This yields state-of-the-art interpretable models on ImageNet, with NBDTs besting all decision-tree-based methods by ~14% to attain 75.30% top-1 accuracy. Code and pretrained NBDTs are at this https URL.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Stephan Alaniz
  2. Joseph E. Gonzalez
  3. Diego Marcos
  4. Christin Seifert
  5. Meike Nauta
  6. Lam M. Nguyen
  7. Alvin Wan
  8. Carlos Eduardo Pedreira

Citations in the corpus