BENDING BEHAVIOR AND BUCKLING OF NANOBEAMS INCLUDING SURFACE STRESS EFFECTS CORRESPONDING TO DIFFERENT BEAM THEORIES

By Reza Ansari, Saeid Sahmani. 2011

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbc10f133d2ae1b8f30893cca9932327dcef66bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Ali Farajpour
2. Hamed Farokhi
3. Mergen H. Ghayesh
4. Mohamed A. Eltaher
5. Samir A. Emam
6. F. F. Mahmoud
7. Ö. Civalek
8. Bekir Akgöz

In Materials Chemistry

1. Ali Farajpour
2. Mergen H. Ghayesh
3. Hamed Farokhi
4. Farzad Ebrahimi
5. Mohamed A. Eltaher
6. Samir A. Emam
7. F. F. Mahmoud
8. Erfan Salari

Citations in the corpus

• Static and stability analysis of nonlocal functionally graded nanobeams (2013, background): “As the dimensions of a structure approach the nanoscale, the classical continuum theories fail to accurately predict the mechanical behavior of nanostructures, Ansari and Sahmani [1].”
• A review on the mechanics of nanostructures (2018, background): “The influence of the surface energy on the bending of nanobeams was also studied in the literature [79, 123]; it was found that the surface influence is more significant for slender nanobeams.”