Moral emotions in restorative justice conferences: managing shame, designing empathy

By B. V. Stokkom. 2002

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbbfdcbb6c76b09aca9b3c7b5963d1591466d055

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Braithwaite
2. Alex R. Piquero
3. Stephanie E Carmichael
4. M. Delisi
5. Wesley G. Jennings
6. Greg Pogarsky

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Stephanie E Carmichael
2. J. Braithwaite
3. Alex R. Piquero
4. Dan Nagin
5. M. Delisi
6. Wesley G. Jennings
7. D. Levi‐Faur
8. Travis C. Pratt

Citations in the corpus

• Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, background): “Emotional tactics such as shame and guilt have been instituted into punishments, and decisions of guilt and sanctions are based on emotion-provoking ideologies such as ‘hate crimes’ and crimes of passion ( Van Stokkom, 2002; Karstedt, 2002).”
• Emotional Dynamics in Restorative Conferences (2004, background): “…of how central the concept of shaming should be to justice procedures, especially when repairing harm for victims, offenders and others is their primary goal, and whether emotions like empathy and remorse are more crucial (Karstedt, 2002; Maxwell and Morris, 2002; van Stokkom, 2002; Sherman, 2003).”