THE IMPACT OF SIZE-DEPENDENT PREDATION ON POPULATION DYNAMICS AND INDIVIDUAL LIFE HISTORY
By D. Claessen, C. V. Oss, A. Roos, L. Persson. 2002
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbbb027d6a5d1d1c05854f511f49d37a066a7d28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
Citations in the corpus
- The influence of size‐dependent life‐history traits on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities (2003, methodology): “…(Murdoch et al. 1992; Murdoch & Nisbet 1996) and we have demonstrated that much can be gained in understanding mechanisms from comparisons of models with differing levels of complexity (e.g. Persson et al. 1998 vs. De Roos & Persson 2003 or De Roos & Persson 2002 vs. De Roos et al. 2003).”
- Food‐dependent individual growth and population dynamics in fishes* (2006, background): “Studies on intraspecific predator–prey (cannibalistic) interactions, however, show that the lower size boundary may have a larger influence on population dynamics of cannibalistic fish populations than the upper size boundary ( Claessen et al., 2002 ).”
- Cannibalism in cephalopods (2010, unknown): “The size range of prey that a predator can capture has been defined as the window of predation and in case of cannibalism as the window of cannibalism (Claessen et al. 2000, 2002).”
- Growing large in a low grade environment: size dependent foraging gain and niche shifts to cannibalism in Arctic char (2006, background): “The size scaling of the upper limits of this predation window, and the availability of prey sizes, ultimately determines at which size an individual can enter the cannibalistic niche (Claessen et al. 2002).”
- A short review of pike ecology (2008, unknown): “The size ranges within which predator and prey interactions take place has been termed by Claessen et al. (2000, 2002) as the ‘predation window’.”