Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation*

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Distributive numerals and distance distributivity in Tlingit (and beyond) (2014, neutral): “Finally, for more complex examples (e.g. 32–34 below), several additional covert movement operations must be posited, which in the case of Korean appear contrary to the language’s more general preference for surface scope (Beck & Kim 1997, Beck 2006).”
Mood and gradability: an investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish (2008, background): “Most recently, Beck (2006, 2007) argues that this view can successfully be adopted for the analysis of a whole range of constructions and linguistic phenomena.”
The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words (2008, background): “249 8.3.3 The semantic interpretation ofin-situ wh-phrases . . . . . 252 8.3.4 How intervention effects are accounted for . . . . . . . . 253 8.3.5 A comparison with Beck (2006) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 8.4 A purely semantic account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”
Intervention Effects in Alternative Questions (2007, methodology): “Conversely, wh-intervention languages from Beck (2006) should also show AltQ intervention (for the same interveners and, where testable, under the same structural conditions).”