Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
By M. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P. Porter, D. White, C. Finder, S. Taplin, Emily White. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
1,087 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb9e38c131213938fa302db9feb15797cac077f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Oncology
In Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. (2002, background): “However, results of 12-month surveillance for interval cancers as a method to detect false-negative examination findings indicate that mammographic sensitivity of 85% diminishes to 70% with lengthening of the surveillance interval to 24 months (23).”
- Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. (2004, neutral): “No screening 56 (16) 161 (16) 72 (15) 289 (15)”
- Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. (2008, neutral): “0) 40 (34) 12 (7) 12 (11) 8 (8) 8 (8) Breast density, %c 25 53 (2.”
- Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. (2004, background): “All malignancies (n 177) 47 64 58 8 Mammography 120 (68) 21 (45) 45 (70) 46 (79) 8 (100) Mammography and clinical examination 137 (77) 32 (68) 49 (76) 48 (83) 8 (100) Clinical examination 89 (50) 29 (62) 33 (52) 25 (43) 2 (25) US 147 (83) 39 (83) 55 (86) 46 (79) 7 (88) Mammography and US 162 (92) 41”
- Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer (2011, background): “Mammography’s sensitivity decreases rapidly with breast density [51].”
- Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). (2002, background): “Mandelson et al [16] evaluated breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection.”