Lizards: Windows to the Evolution of Diversity
565 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb90ff6ea5bb9a37fa3a8f4267f94bec22fc6769
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Vicariance and endemism in a Neotropical savanna hotspot: distribution patterns of Cerrado squamate reptiles (2011, background): “…ability and small ranges (Gaston, 1996), high habitat and microhabitat fidelity, and extensive variation in lifehistory parameters (Greene, 1997; Pianka & Vitt, 2003), may provide detailed data on distribution patterns, information critical to conservation strategies based on evolutionary and…”
- A monographic catalogue on the systematics and phylogeny of the South American iguanian lizard family Liolaemidae (Squamata, Iguania) (2008, background): “In general for lizards, it has often been observed that herbivory has evolved many times in different clades (Cooper & Vitt 2002; Pianka & Vitt 2003), mostly in species characterized by large body size and high preferred metabolic temperatures, and occurring in warm environments, a pattern…”
- Breaking the Social–Non‐social Dichotomy: A Role for Reptiles in Vertebrate Social Behavior Research? (2013, background): “Squamate reptiles, in particular, communicate using chemosensory cues that are not detectable by the human senses (Burghardt 1970; Pianka & Vitt 2003).”
- Optimal foraging constrains macroecological patterns: body size and dietary niche breadth in lizards (2008, background): “Lizards have proven to be ideal models for ecological studies because they are taxonomically diverse, exhibit a wide range of body sizes, are easily sampled and their diets can be quantitatively summarized and compared (Pianka & Vitt, 2003).”
- A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes (2013, background): “Squamates a re pr ently found on every continent except Antarctica, and in the Indian and Pacifi c O eans, and span many diverse ecologies and body forms, from limbless burrowers t o arboreal gliders (summarized in [2-4]).”
- Hot, dry and different: Australian lizard richness is unlike that of mammals, amphibians and birds (2010, background): “Pianka & Vitt (2003) illustrated how Ctenotus species are clustered around central Australia.”
- A fresh framework for the ecology of arid Australia (2011, background): “Reptiles are amixture of Gondwanan lineages and northern arrivals in the Miocene (Hutchinson and Smith, 2006), with the lizard radiation in arid Australia especially notable (Oliver et al., 2009; Pianka and Vitt, 2003).”
- Chemosensory assessment of rival competitive ability and scent-mark function in a lizard, Podarcis hispanica (2007, background): “…chemical communication is important in lizard social behaviour, allowing lizards to derive complex information regarding species, sex, reproductive status, familiarity, relatedness, fluctuating asymmetry or even size-specific information (e.g. Pianka & Vitt 2003; Shine et al. 2003; Labra 2006).”
- Fecundity Selection and the Evolution of Reproductive Output and Sex-Specific Body Size in the Liolaemus Lizard Adaptive Radiation (2011, background): “However, since brood mass and offspring number in lizards have been observed to be described by a negative genetic correlation (Sinervo 2000; Pianka and Vitt 2003; Shine 2005), where departures from this trade-off result in lower fitness mediated by stabilizing selection on the opposing Evol Biol (2”
- Biases in the current knowledge of threat status in lizards, and bridging the ‘assessment gap’ (2016, unknown): “Lizards (here including the squamate suborders Sauria and Amphisbaenia) are highly diverse and nearly cosmopolitan, with a plethora of life styles, reproductive characteristics, sizes, shapes and colours- and threats (Pianka and Vitt, 2003).”
- Beyond 'nasty neighbours' and 'dear enemies'? Individual recognition by scent marks in a lizard (Podarcis hispanica) (2008, background): “Numerous studies have shown that chemical stimuli allow recognition of sex, reproductive status, familiarity, relatedness and even size-specific information in squamates (e.g. Cooper 1998; Pianka & Vitt 2003; Shine et al. 2003; Labra 2006).”