Invited comment on the paper "Slice Sampling" by Radford Neal
By Stephen G. Walker. 2003
954 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb3cd08c658593e009526b3e3c6a41611a866d62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David S. Greenberg
- Conor Durkan
- Osvaldo A. Martin
- Simon Robert Arridge
- Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
- Thomas V. Wiecki
- Peter Maass
- Ozan Öktem
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Simon Robert Arridge
- Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
- Thomas V. Wiecki
- Peter Maass
- Ozan Öktem
- Joshua S. Speagle
- U. Edinburgh
In Statistics and Probability
- David S. Greenberg
- Conor Durkan
- Álvaro Tejero-Cantero
- Simon Robert Arridge
- Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
- Thomas V. Wiecki
- Peter Maass
- Ozan Öktem
Citations in the corpus
- PyMC: a modern, and comprehensive probabilistic programming framework in Python (2023, methodology): “Other available inference methods include random-walk Metropolis (including specialized versions for binary and categorical parameters), a slice sampler ( Neal, 2003 ), and Differential Evolution Metropolis sampling ( Ter Braak, 2006 ).”
- dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences (2019, methodology): “These are based on the “stepping out” method proposed in Neal (2003) and Jasa & Xiang (2012), which works as follows in the single-variable case starting from the position xk of the kth live point: (i) Draw a standard uniform random number U. (ii) Set the left bound L = xk − wU and the right as R =…”