Does 401(k) Eligibility Increase Saving? Evidence from Propensity Score Subclassification

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Program evaluation with high-dimensional data (2013, methodology): “They applied it to the specific problem of the linear instrumental variables model with many instruments where the nuisance function h0 is the optimal 3See also Poterba, Venti, and Wise (1994; 1995; 1996; 2001), Abadie (2003), Benjamin (2003), and Ogburn et al. (2015) among others.”
Do CRM Systems Cause One-to-One Marketing Effectiveness? (2006, result): “considering various sources of uncertainty, and finds that standard errors computed using different methods often give similar results (Agodini and Dynarski, 2004; Benjamin, 2003).”
Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data (2013, methodology): “21Poterba, Venti, and Wise (1994; 1995; 1996; 2001) and Benjamin (2003) all focus on estimating the effect of 401(k) eligibility, the intention to treat parameter.”
Threshold Regression with Endogeneity (2017, unknown): “This sample is often referred to as the 1991 SIPP, and is used extensively in the literature to examine the effect of 401(k) plans on wealth; see, inter alia, Benjamin (2003), Engen and Gale (2000), Engen et al. (1996) and Poterba et al. (1994, 1995, 1998).”