Global anisotropic phase velocity maps for fundamental mode surface waves between 40 and 150 s

By Jeannot Trampert, J. Woodhouse. 2003

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb11384792e73221eca9efd6cda765e81c22a087

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Cooling history of the Pacific lithosphere (2003, background): “The authors are grateful to researchers at Harvard [12,24] and Utrecht [ 14 ,45] Universities for contributing phase velocity measurements to this study.”
Seismic observations of large-scale deformation at the bottom of fast-moving plates (2012, background): “…range, azimuthal anisotropy is in general perpendicular to the ridge axis, in agreement with previous global surface wave observations (Tanimoto and Anderson, 1984; Montagner and Tanimoto, 1991; Trampert and Woodhouse, 2003; Debayle et al., 2005; Beucler and Montagner, 2006; Becker et al., 2012).”
Global adjoint tomography: first-generation model (2016, unknown): “…Boschi & Dziewoński 2000; Zhou et al. 2006), surface-wave dispersion (e.g. Trampert & Woodhouse 1995; Ekström et al. 1997; Shapiro & Ritzwoller 2002; Trampert & Woodhouse 2003; Ekström 2011), shear and surface waveforms (e.g. Woodhouse & Dziewoński 1984; Li & Romanowicz 1996; Lebedev & van…”
Constraints on lithosphere net rotation and asthenospheric viscosity from global mantle flow models and seismic anisotropy (2010, methodology): “…orientation (LPO) [McKenzie, 1979; Ribe, 1989] that can be detected seismically [e.g., Hess, 1964; Montagner, 1994] using surface waves [e.g., Trampert and Woodhouse, 2003; Becker et al., 2003; Debayle et al., 2005] or shear wave splitting measurements [e.g., Silver and Chan, 1988; Savage, 1999].”
Eikonal tomography: surface wave tomography by phase front tracking across a regional broad‐band seismic array (2009, methodology): “This trade-off is most severe for azimuthal anisotropy, as has been well documented by previous studies (e.g. Laske & Master 1998; Levshin et al. 2001; Trampert & Woodhouse 2003; Smith et al. 2004; Deschamps et al. 2008), in which the amplitude of anisotropy is particularly poorly determined.”
Global crustal thickness from neural network inversion of surface wave data (2007, methodology): “The aim of this study is to investigate how well Moho depth can be retrieved from current phase (Trampert & Woodhouse 2003) and group velocity (Ritzwoller et al. 2002) maps without the use of restrictive a priori constraints.”
On the relationship between azimuthal anisotropy from shear wave splitting and surface wave tomography (2012, methodology): “For norm damping, we use Rn = w I where I is the identity matrix and w a damping factor; for wavelength-dependent, “roughness” damping, we use Rr = w ‘ ‘þ1ð Þ L=2 L=2þ1ð Þ I [cf. Trampert and Woodhouse, 2003].”