Effect of MAPP as a Coupling Agent on the Performance of Jute–PP Composites

By Smita Mohanty, S. K. Nayak, S. Verma, S. Tripathy. 2004

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010 (2012, methodology): “[221] used MAPP as a coupling agent for the surface modification of jute fibers.”
Industrial applications of natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites – challenges and opportunities (2018, background): “Research studies have revealed maleic anhydride as an effective compatibilizer for better matrix–fibre adhesion (John and Anandjiwala 2008; Singha et al. 2009; Mohanty et al. 2004; Gao and Mäder 2006; Samal, Mohanty, and Nayak 2009).”
A review on the properties of natural fibres and its bio-composites: Effect of alkali treatment (2020, methodology): “To overcome a quantity of problem related to the use of lignocellulosic fibres, various chemical treatments were carried out such as alkaline treatment,(35,36) acetylation, benzoylation, silane, acrylation and acrylonitrile grafting, peroxide, permanganate,(54,55) isocyanate,(56,57) sodium chlorite,”
Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview (2012, methodology): “[46] used jute fibre (30% fibre loading, 6mm on fibre length) treated with 0.”
Influence of fibre-surface treatment on structural, thermal and mechanical properties of jute fibre and its composite (2009, unknown): “Percentage of water absorbed was calculated as follows (Mohanty et al 2004).”