Mechanisms underlying cross-orientation suppression in cat visual cortex
By Nicholas J. Priebe, D. Ferster. 2006
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Matteo Carandini
- David J. Heeger
- D. Ferster
- Dario L. Ringach
- Nicholas J. Priebe
- Ian M. Finn
- T. Freeman
- Severine Durand
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Matteo Carandini
- David J. Heeger
- Dario L. Ringach
- D. Ferster
- Nicholas J. Priebe
- Michael W. Spratling
- Ian M. Finn
- T. Freeman
Citations in the corpus
- Normalization as a canonical neural computation (2011, background): “Some of these explanations rely on non-linearities in the afferent inpu”
- Dynamics of Suppression in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex (2006, background): “Finally, Priebe and Ferster (2006) have shown recently that suppression can result from nonlinearities (contrast saturation and rectification) that reduce the feedforward excitatory signal from the LGN, without either synaptic depression or synaptic inhibition being involved.”
- The emergence of contrast-invariant orientation tuning in simple cells of cat visual cortex. (2007, methodology): “Contrast saturation and spike-rate rectification of relay cells in theLGNcanaccountforalargemeasureofcrossorientation suppression (Li et al., 2006; Priebe and Ferster, 2006 ).”
- The Operating Point of the Cortex: Neurons as Large Deviation Detectors (2007, background): “This demonstrates that in our experimental conditions there is not a strong saturation of the geniculate signal that could contribute to threshold invariance in V1 (Priebe and Ferster, 2006).”
- Inhibition, spike threshold, and stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex. (2008, unknown): “Nearly identical results are obtained when the nonlinear model is based on recorded responses from relay cells instead of rectified sinusoids (Priebe and Ferster, 2006).”
- Inhibitory Stabilization of the Cortical Network Underlies Visual Surround Suppression (2009, background): “By comparison, cross-orientation suppression from within the receptive field center, which is likely subcortical in origin (Li et al., 2006; Priebe and Ferster, 2006), is not delayed (Smith et al.”
- A Normalization Model of Multisensory Integration (2011, unknown): “This input non-linearity models response saturation in the sensory inputs 21 , which could be mediated via synaptic depression 22 or normalization within the unisensory pathways.”
- Contrast gain control and cortical TrkB signaling shape visual acuity (2010, background): “or to be caused by contrast saturation in LGN response”
- GABAA inhibition controls response gain in visual cortex (2011, unknown): “Normalization is now thought to rely on alternative mechanisms, at least for phenomena that arise within the receptive field (Carandini et al., 2002; Priebe and Ferster, 2006; Finn et al., 2007).”
- Temporal properties of surround suppression in cat primary visual cortex (2007, background): “Indeed, a feedforward model of cross-orientation suppression based on LGN responses forms the basis of current views of this phenomenon ~Carandini et al., 2002; Freeman et al., 2002; Li et al., 2006; Priebe & Ferster, 2006!.”
- Predictive Coding as a Model of Response Properties in Cortical Area V1 (2010, background): “…of the source of suppression, rather than its total strength, that changes with temporal frequency and this argues against suggestions that cortex is not a source of the suppression generated by high temporal frequency stimuli (Carandini et al., 2002; Li et al., 2006; Priebe and Ferster, 2006).”