Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide

By M. Buckley, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, S. Howard, S. Campbell, J. Thomas-Oates, Matthew J. Collins. 2010

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Collagen fingerprinting of archaeological bone and teeth remains from Domuztepe, South Eastern Turkey (2011, unknown): “Though their bones are difficult to distinguish, domestic sheep (Ovis aries) and goats (Capra hircus) are dissimilar in many ways: they have different feeding patterns and requirements with regards to husbandry practices, they tolerate different environmental conditions and they provide a variety of”
Species identification and decay assessment of Late Pleistocene fragmentary vertebrate remains from Pin Hole Cave (Creswell Crags, UK) using collagen fingerprinting (2017, methodology): “…of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. bs_bs_banner related domesticated taxa such as sheep (Ovis) and goat (Capra) faunal remains (Buckley et al. 2009, 2010; Buckley & Kansa 2011).”
Species identification of archaeological marine mammals using collagen fingerprinting (2014, methodology): “Although themajority of samples showed little improvement in the signal of the larger, hydrophobic peptides, it has previously been vital in the detection of such peptides, and has been particularly useful in quickly identifying peptides D and G in other analyses (Buckley et al., 2010; Buckley and C”