Phenology of a northern hardwood forest canopy
By A. D. Richardson, A. Bailey, E. Denny, C. Martin, J. O'keefe. 2006
450 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bacd2ffa777a6d6edc1352ed5679016edadb61e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- James S. Clark
- Andrew D. Richardson
- J. O'keefe
- Molly E. Brown
- L. Galloway
- Brian P. Haggerty
- Scott V. Ollinger
- Youngryel Ryu
In Global and Planetary Change
- Andrew D. Richardson
- J. O'keefe
- X. Morin
- David Y. Hollinger
- Trevor Keenan
- Molly E. Brown
- Mirco Migliavacca
- L. Galloway
In Plant Science
- Andrew D. Richardson
- J. O'keefe
- Trevor Keenan
- L. Galloway
- Brian P. Haggerty
- Scott V. Ollinger
- Youngryel Ryu
- Oliver Sonnentag
Citations in the corpus
- Phenological Differences Between Understory and Overstory: A Case Study Using the Long-Term Harvard Forest Records (2009, methodology): “…gradients (particularly latitude but also elevation) are a dominant control on phenology, as budburst by higher-latitude and higherelevation individuals generally follows that of lower-latitude and lower-elevation individuals (e.g., Lechowicz 1984 ; Richardson et al. 2006 ; Fisher et al. 2007) .”
- Urban heat island impacts on plant phenology: intra-urban variability and response to land cover (2016, methodology): “In short, we used a heating and cooling degree day (HDD and CDD) approach developed by Richardson et al (2006) for sugar maple, which is the Wisconsin state tree and an important component of Madison’s urban canopy.”
- Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system (2013, background): “8 days/decade) of spring leaf-out in recent decades, lthough considerable variability among species and studies has een reported (Richardson et al., 2006; Vitasse et al., 2009; Jeong t al., 2011).”
- Tree phenology responses to winter chilling, spring warming, at north and south range limits (2014, methodology): “1 are used (examples include Richardson et al. 2006; Caffarra, Donnelly & Chuine 2011), but the fundamental assumptions we address below apply to all models of this basic form.”
- Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest (2007, methodology): “A separate set of model parameters was fit to each day’s data, and maximum likelihood parameter estimates were obtained using weighted absolute deviations optimization (see Hollinger and Richardson 2005; Richardson et al. 2006b).”
- Remote sensing of larch phenological cycle and analysis of relationships with climate in the Alpine region (2010, background): “If this assumption does not hold, the accuracy of phenological dates estimated by these models can be expected to be spatially variable to a large extent, reflecting the variability in climate–phenology relationships (e.g., Richardson et al., 2006; Fisher et al., 2007).”
- Phenological Differences Between Understory and Overstory (2009, background): “Plants exhibit both phenotypic plasticity and genotypic adaptation to different growth environments (Schlichting 1986 ; Sultan 1995) . In terms of phenology, these responses can be manifest as differences in spring budburst and autumn senescence within species across environmental gradients at varyi”
- Response of individual components of reproductive phenology to growing season length in a monocarpic herb (2011, background): “Warm summer temperatures are also persisting later (Linderholm 2006) and, in response, trees are holding their leaves longer into the autumn (Menzel & Fabian 1999; Peñuelas, Filella & Comas 2002; Richardson et al. 2006).”
- Recent changes in phenology over the northern high latitudes detected from multi-satellite data (2011, background): “A warmer spring could easily trigger earlier snow melt, thaw of topsoil and germination of early spring plants, making the signal of spring vegetation visible from satellites earlier in the year (Parmesan and Yohe 2003, Richardson et al 2006, Jeong et al 2009, Yu et al 2010).”
- Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems (2012, background): “At Harvard Forest, spring and autumn phenology of several hardwood tree species have been observed since 1990 at threeto-seven day intervals (Richardson et al., 2006; Richardson and O’Keefe, 2009).”
- Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982–2008 (2011, methodology): “In autumn, leaf senescence over the temperate forest is mainly modulated by cumulative cold temperatures below a certain threshold temperature (Richardson et al., 2006).”
- Leaf phenology in 22 North American tree species during the 21st century (2009, methodology): “Leaf unfolding was modeled in the framework of a Unified General Model (Chuine, 2000) that is defined by nine specific parameters, but that can be simplified when appropriate by using simpler parameterization for chilling and/or forcing processes as in Richardson et al. (2006).”