Data Poisoning Attacks against Autoregressive Models

By Scott Alfeld, Xiaojin Zhu, Paul R. Barford. 2016

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Forecasting models play a key role in money-making ventures in many different markets. Such models are often trained on data from various sources, some of which may be untrustworthy.An actor in a given market may be incentivised to drive predictions in a certain direction to their own benefit.Prior analyses of intelligent adversaries in a machine-learning context have focused on regression and classification.In this paper we address the non-iid setting of time series forecasting.We consider a forecaster, Bob, using a fixed, known model and a recursive forecasting method.An adversary, Alice, aims to pull Bob's forecasts toward her desired target series, and may exercise limited influence on the initial values fed into Bob's model.We consider the class of linear autoregressive models, and a flexible framework of encoding Alice's desires and constraints.We describe a method of calculating Alice's optimal attack that is computationally tractable, and empirically demonstrate its effectiveness compared to random and greedy baselines on synthetic and real-world time series data.We conclude by discussing defensive strategies in the face of Alice-like adversaries.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Bo Li
  2. Nicolas Papernot
  3. Dawn Song
  4. Nicholas Carlini
  5. Percy Liang
  6. Vitaly Shmatikov
  7. Patrick Drew McDaniel
  8. Neil Zhenqiang Gong

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Bo Li
  2. Dawn Song
  3. Nicolas Papernot
  4. Nicholas Carlini
  5. Vitaly Shmatikov
  6. Jamie Hayes
  7. Patrick Drew McDaniel
  8. Neil Zhenqiang Gong

Citations in the corpus