An embedded-boundary formulation for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows interacting with moving boundaries

By Jianming Yang, Elias Balaras. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006

632 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bab965b7f782686d53337628f5ca60693972169d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

On the numerical oscillation of the direct-forcing immersed-boundary method for moving boundaries (2012, methodology): “Note that the present categorization of the ghost cells is the same as that in Mittal et al. [12], and the categorization of the present hybrid cells is the same as that for the “forcing points” in Yang & Balaras [11].”
A comparative study of direct‐forcing immersed boundary‐lattice Boltzmann methods for stationary complex boundaries (2011, background): “For moving boundary problems, as mentioned in Section 1, the sharp interface scheme can suffer spurious oscillations due to the discontinuous change of forcing points and freshly cleared cell problems [22, 28].”
A smoothing technique for discrete delta functions with application to immersed boundary method in moving boundary simulations (2009, methodology): “Yang and Balaras [11] used a ‘‘field-extension” approach to simulate flows with moving boundaries.”
Simulating flows with moving rigid boundary using immersed-boundary method (2010, methodology): “The interaction of an oscillating circular cylinder with a fluid at rest is frequently reported in the literature [28,29,32,43].”
Fluid–structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems (2014, methodology): “The underlying ideas of the immersed-boundary method are very different depending on the specific implementations, for example, the continuous forcing approach originally developed by Peskin [8], the direct forcing approach based on local flow reconstruction [9, 10, 11], and the projection approach ”
A Sharp-Interface Immersed Boundary Method with Improved Mass Conservation and Reduced Spurious Pressure Oscillations (2011, neutral): “Past approaches to the discretization of fresh-cells have involved actual or effective merging of fresh-cells with neighboring cells [16], use of ghostcells values to provide time-history for fresh-cell variables [21], and the use of Lagrangian interpolation along particle paths [13] to estimate the”
A numerical method for solving the 3D unsteady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear domains with complex immersed boundaries (2007, background): “The latter class of methods, on the other hand, treats solid boundaries as sharp interfaces utilizing either Cartesian, cut-cell formulations [3,4] or hybrid Cartesian/Immersed Boundary (HCIB) approaches (see [5,6,1,7]”
Numerical Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction — A Review (2012, background): “…and Layton 2009), particle assembly (Liu et al. 2006), aerodynamics (Haase 2001, Zhang, Jiang and Ye 2007), turbulence (Kaligzin and Iaccarino 2003, Yang and Balaras 2006), complex flows in irregular domains (Fadlun et al. 2000, Udaykumar et al. 1996, 2001), electro-hydrodynamics (Hoburg and…”