Explaining Deviance by Adolescent Females

By N. Lanctôt, M. Le Blanc. Crime and justice, 2002

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/baaa8bdf9c10b0a3e9ae20d6abf5ed721031d6a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Stephen A. Cernkovich
2. Peggy C. Giordano
3. N. Lanctôt
4. Arjan A. J. Blokland
5. Paul Nieuwbeerta

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paul Nieuwbeerta
2. Arjan A. J. Blokland
3. Peggy C. Giordano
4. N. Lanctôt
5. Stephen A. Cernkovich
6. Alex R. Piquero
7. R. Apel
8. Dan Nagin

Citations in the corpus

• Predicting Adolescent and Adult Antisocial Behavior Among Adjudicated Delinquent Females (2008, background): “…reveal that official female criminality, as well as self-reported delinquency, is less serious, begins later in adolescence, and is less persistent than male criminality and delinquency (Cernkovich & Giordano, 1979; Lanctôt & LeBlanc, 2002; McCord, 1993; Steffensmeier & Streifel, 1993).”
• Long-Term Patterns of Offending in Women (2010, background): “As Cauffman (2008), Daly and Chesney-Lind (1988), Holsinger (2000), Lanctôt and LeBlanc (2002), and Simpson et al. (2008) have argued, we cannot fully understand gender differences in offending without detailed information about the interaction of individual’s criminal justice system involvement…”