Relatively Rough Flow Resistance Equations

By G. Smart, M. Duncan, Jeremy M. Walsh. 2002

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/baa46ce7f880f64d3682f7c2f888903db8799ef8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Ferguson
2. S. Dingman
3. V. Ivanov
4. Jongho Kim
5. Nikolaos D. Katopodes

In Soil Science

1. V. Ivanov
2. R. Ferguson
3. Jongho Kim
4. Nikolaos D. Katopodes

In Water Science and Technology

1. R. Ferguson

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of constitutive flow resistance equations based on the Manning and Chezy equations applied to natural rivers (2005, background): “…than about 400), and for relatively small-scale roughness (when the water depth is five to ten times the roughness height [Katul et al., 2002]), the Reynolds number is less important, and flow resistance can be defined as the ratio between stream velocity and shear velocity [Smart et al., 2002].”
• Hydraulic resistance to overland flow on surfaces with partially submerged vegetation (2012, background): “Thus, other variables, such as the flowrate, Fr, and Re need to be considered to fully characterize the flow resistance [Takken and Govers, 2000; Smart et al., 2002; Hu and Abrahams, 2006].”
• Flow resistance equations for gravel‐ and boulder‐bed streams (2007, methodology): “The flumecalibrated logarithmic equation of Smart et al. [2002] also plots close to the upper edge of the shallow-flow data, but nearer the middle of the scatter at higher submergence.”