Evolutionary demography of monocarpic perennials.

By Jessica E. Metcalf, K. A. Rose, M. Rees. 2003

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trajectories and models of individual growth (2006, background): “see the discussion on the dependence of survival, flowering, and fertility on size in perennial plants in (Metcalf et al., 2003)) A larger size usually means better survival and reproduction, but growth has its costs.”
Dispersal, demography and spatial population models for conservation and control management (2008, background): “This exciting technique is rapidly gaining in popularity because of its obvious utility (Rees and Rose, 2002; Childs et al., 2003; Metcalf et al., 2003).”
Comparing rates of contemporary evolution in life-history traits for exploited fish stocks (2012, background): “2002; Heino and Dieckmann 2008) is: 215 (3) s ps 3 , 216 where βs is the length (size) coefficient of the reaction norm model (Metcalf et al. 2003).”
DEMOGRAPHIC AND EVOLUTIONARY IMPACTS OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE INSECT HERBIVORES ON CIRSIUM CANESCENS (2005, methodology): “Here, we used life history and evolutionary (ESS) theories to estimate the selection imposed by the introduced floral herbivore Rhinocyllus conicus on size at flowering, a key component of fitness (Metcalf et al. 2003), of its adopted native plant host, Cirsium canescens.”