Functional benefits of predator species diversity depend on prey identity

By A. Wilby, S. Villareal, L. P. Lan, K. Heong, M. Thomas. 2005

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba929e001d990565854e038c7387081b275fb62a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. T. Tscharntke
2. W. E. Snyder
3. Alexandra-Maria Klein
4. J. Tylianakis
5. D. Kleijn
6. R. Bommarco
7. D. Finke
8. Y. Clough

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. T. Tscharntke
2. W. E. Snyder
3. J. Emmett Duffy
4. J. Bruno
5. J. Tylianakis
6. B. Cardinale
7. Alexandra-Maria Klein
8. Michel Loreau

Citations in the corpus

• Resource Heterogeneity Moderates the Biodiversity-Function Relationship in Real World Ecosystems (2008, background): “[31,32], identity [12], or relative abundance in the environ-”
• Biological Control of Insect Pests in Agroecosystems: Effects of Crop Management, Farming Systems, and Seminatural Habitats at the Landscape Scale: A Review (2010, background): “In the literature, a large number of studies have reported evidences for each of these possible effects (Finke and Denno, 2005; Rosenheim, 2007; Schmitz, 2009; Snyder et al., 2006; Straub and Snyder, 2006; Wilby et al., 2005).”
• Efficacy and economics of shelter habitats for conservation biological control (2008, background): “…is significant niche partitioning across microhabitats and functional complementarity among spider species for example (Sunderland, 1999), few other studies have shown significant complementarity among natural enemies (but see Snyder and Wise, 1999; Wilby and Thomas, 2002; Wilby et al., 2005).”
• The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. (2007, background): “Some of these have shown that increasing predator diversity indirectly increases plant performance in agricultural (Cardinale et al. 2003; Wilby et al. 2005; Snyder et al. 2006), salt marsh (Finke & Denno 2005), and kelp forest systems (Byrnes et al. 2006).”
• Cascading effects of predator richness (2008, background): “Although other studies also indicate that predator richness can enhance pest control (Wilby et al. 2005), there are a number of counterexamples.”
• Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals (2008, background): “e bug, ladybird beetle and cricket attacking a caterpillar on rice Wilby et al. (2005)”
• Field margin vegetation enhances biological control and crop damage suppression from multiple pests in organic tomato fields (2014, background): “…assigning arthropods to different functional groups (Bengtsson, 1998; Tscharntke et al., 2007; Moonen & B arberi, 2008; Noordijk et al., 2010; Poveda et al., 2012), and each of these functional groups may contribute to the mortality of the same herbivore (Wilby et al., 2005; Werling et al., 2012).”
• Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale (2007, background): “, 1993; Snyder and Wise, 2001; Finke and Denno, 2004), strengthen (Losey and Denno, 1998; Snyder and Ives, 2003; Schmidt et al., 2003; Wilby et al., 2005; Snyder et al., 2006) or have neutral (Chang, 1996; Wilby et al.”
• A review of principles for sustainable pest management in rice (2012, background): “(Wilby et al., 2005); meanwhile, the excessive use of chemical fertilizers and the short times between successive rice crops promoted hopper fitness and stimulated oviposition (Lu et al.”