Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils

By M. S. Khan, A. Zaidi, P. A. Wani, Mohammad Oves. 2009

590 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba8ce88a46cdf79eba7570aa47fe5dff6bd9f668

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. M. Ahemad
2. M. Prasad
3. Anita Singh

In Pollution

1. M. Ahemad
2. Juan-Pablo Hernández
3. Y. Bashan
4. L. de-Bashan
5. M. Arshad
6. M. Prasad
7. M. S. Khan
8. S. Prasad

Citations in the corpus

• Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective (2014, background): “Climatic variations also have a large impact on the effectiveness of PGPR but sometimes unfavorable growth conditions in the field are to be expected as normal functioning of agriculture (Zaidi et al., 2009).”
• Rhizobacteria and phytoremediation of heavy metals (2016, background): “It disrupts the membranes acting as genotoxic substance and disintegrate the cell organelles [1,6].”
• The potential contribution of plant growth-promoting bacteria to reduce environmental degradation – A comprehensive evaluation (2012, background): “This results from a combined effect of bacterial hormone production, solubilization of inorganic phosphate, and adsorption of nickel (Khan et al., 2009).”
• Chromium reducing and plant growth promoting novel strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa OSG41 enhance chickpea growth in chromium amended soils (2013, background): “Mechanistically, PGPR reduce the metal toxicity by different mechanisms such as biosorption, mobilizing metals through the excretion of organic acids or bioleaching, immobilization or bio-mineralization, intracellular accumulation, and enzyme-catalyzed transformation [24,28].”
• Reduction of heavy metal load in food chain: technology assessment (2011, background): “It is one of the most suitable choices for bioremediation studies because it reduces the metal toxicity as well as promotes growth of plants grown in metal contaminated soil ( Khan et al. 2009 ).”
• Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. (2012, background): “, organic acids, siderophores), oxidation/reduction reactions (Gadd, 2000; Khan et al., 2009; Kidd et al., 2009; Uroz et al., 2009; Wenzel, 2009; Rajkumar et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2011a).”
• Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Sustainable Agriculture (2009, background): “3 PGPR for Bioremediation Recently, the application of PGPR in association with plants has been expanded to remediate contaminated soils (Khan et al. 2009).”
• A review on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria acting as bioinoculants and their biological approach towards the production of sustainable agriculture (2015, background): “Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM), are those micro-organisms that provide the available forms of P to the plants and hence are the viable substitute to chemical phosphatic fertilizers (Khan et al., 2009).”
• Phytoremediation of Soils Contaminated with Metals and Metalloids at Mining Areas: Potential of Native Flora (2014, background): “distribution of nutrients, however species of the genus Pseudomonas are the predominant organisms associated with roots [13,32,33].”
• Microbes as Potential Tool for Remediation of Heavy Metals: A Review (2016, background): “The amassing of metals in hyper accumulators often reaches 1–5% of the dry weight [88].”
• IMPLICATIONS OF BACTERIAL RESISTANCE AGAINST HEAVY METALS IN BIOREMEDIATION: A REVIEW (2012, background): “Therefore, assessment of heavy metal bioavailability helps to evaluate the impact of metals on soil microbes and in predicting the application of bioremediation technologies that could be used to clean up metals from the polluted soils [17].”