Some Recent Developments in Turbulence Closure Modeling
By P. Durbin. 2018
350 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba56ee354fce2caac2ed06b1ef6712879a880db4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Heng Xiao
- Paola Cinnella
- Karthik Duraisamy
- Gianluca Iaccarino
- Konstantin Weissenow
- Nils Thuerey
- Lukas Prantl
- Xiangyu Y. Hu
In Environmental Engineering
- Heng Xiao
- Paola Cinnella
- Gianluca Iaccarino
- Karthik Duraisamy
- Konstantin Weissenow
- Nils Thuerey
- Lukas Prantl
- Xiangyu Y. Hu
Citations in the corpus
- Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data (2018, background): “kes equations such as convection and diusion; additional contributions and source terms are often included to represent known sensitivities, such as near wall dynamics, rotational corrections, etc. (Durbin 2017). Although it is possible to derive dierential models formally through repeated applicati”
- Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review (2018, methodology): “Recent development of turbulence modeling in RANS, LES, and hybrid approaches has been reviewed by Durbin [11].”
- Deep Learning Methods for Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations of Airfoil Flows (2018, methodology): “…learning methods in the field of computer vision [KSH12, IZZE16, KALL17], and first success stories of applications in the area of physics simulations [TSSP16, XFCT18, BFM18, RYK18, BSHHB18], the corrsponding research communities retain a skeptical stance towards deep learning algorithms [Dur18].”